A great post from Martha Joseph on http://aplasticblog.blogspot.com/ (a killer blog!):
We all remember Jerry Saltz's astute criticism of MoMA (http://nymag.com/arts/art/features/40979/) for the pitiful number of women artists on display in their permanent collection. Printed after a summer of blowout women’s art exhibitions that prompted Nancy Princenthal in Art in America to call 2007 “a banner year for feminism in the visual arts,” such an exposé made MoMA look rather foolish and behind the times, at least in my mind. However, with full awareness of their cultural hegemony, the MoMA seemed to shrug off Saltz’s words with little effort (or at least get away with ignoring the critique completely)…or did it?
Let me take a step back for a moment. Having moved to the city recently, I’ve been making the standard museum and gallery rounds. So naturally I made my way uptown to see the Olafur Eliasson show before it closed (who doesn’t want to see some Smithson and James Turrell slickly rehashed?). However, what peaked my interest was not what I came to see, but instead a room tucked away in the contemporary galleries devoted to Sigalit Landau, a contemporary female Israeli artist. The exhibition is part of MoMA’s Projects Series, founded in 1971 as a forum for young emerging artists. This mini-exhibition consists of three remarkable video works and a number of salt-encrusted lamp-like sculptures. The most recognizable of the videos is Barbed Hula (2000) featured in Global Feminisms. However the most memorable is DeadSee (2005) in which a raft-like spiral of whole and half-eaten watermelons floats on the Dead Sea and slowly unfurls. The artist, locked in the center, is spun around and around until the watermelon coil is unraveled, leaving her body exposed.
If MoMA’s “all boys club” reputation is valid, then what is work by an artist in Global Feminisms doing there?
It's worth noting that Landau isn’t the only feminist artist currently on display. In the contemporary galleries reside a powerful Nancy Spero, a visceral set of Lynda Benglis sculptures, and an incredible Louise Bourgeois along with a number of other works by female artists either explicitly or implicitly feminist.Is MoMA finally jumping on the bandwagon? Is MoMA finally heeding the Guerrilla Girls’ warnings? Or is it temporarily paying lip service to the pressure to show artists from more diverse backgrounds?
While Eliasson still dominates, perhaps this is a step in the direction of positive change. Perhaps this is also a sign that for better or for worse feminist art is less of a radical movement and is gradually being integrated into major art historical institutions…but that’s an issue I’ll take up another day.
I wouldn't be so quick to say that the MoMA is necessarily hopping on the bandwagon. The MoMA has only hosted three retrospectives on women: Louise Bourgeois, Lee Bontcou and recently Elizabeth Murray. While neither of these three artists command the prices at auctions that their male counterparts do, they are still respected and well established artist. I think the problem is that MoMA should be looking to the future and selecting more contemporary feminist artists to showcase (and this is my argument for museums across the board, including the MET, Guggenheim and Whitney). The Landau is a step in the right direction, but I think more can be done - we all know Kiki Smith and Nancy Spero, lets push toward the future and show the up and coming. Ghada Amer at the Brooklyn Museum is a great example - it is hard to imagine that this is only her first solo museum exhibition in the United States. Amer's poignant concern for the sexual representation of women across the globe is poignant and much needed. Though more importantly it is people like Martha Joseph who are concerned about the under representation of women in museums and art institutions that is needed at this time. Art historians and art activists MUST continue to write, publish, protest and act out their anger for the establishment's disrespect for women/feminist artists.
No comments:
Post a Comment